🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content appear to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."